Studio Visit: Woomin Kim by Louis Bury

The difference between studio materials and life materials.

Woomin Kim3

Woomin Kim studio. All photos by Louis Bury.

Segmented lengths of embroidered tubing jut out from one wall of Woomin Kim’s artist-residency studio at the Queens Museum in New York City. The pipework structure, whose looping shape and wooden supports recall a roller coaster, extends five or six feet into the room before terminating at the floor, as though the whimsical artwork connected one part of the museum’s infrastructure to another. Nearby, another serpentine sculpture-in-progress from the same series, Pipe Dream (2019), has wide tubing and a crazy quilt color scheme that’s the exuberant opposite of actual pipes’ austere rigidity.

Woomin Kim2
Woomin Kim 1
Woomin Kim4

Kim’s droll sculptures and wall hangings exist in unexpected mimetic relation to their referents. Her delightful Minerals in Use series (2018), for example, combines household goods (toilet paper, sponges, candles) with craft supplies (crayons, beads, glue) to fabricate objects that look like real geodes yet don’t try to pass themselves off as such. Works in her Urban Nest series (2017), on the other hand—enormous, loom-woven rectangles of found fibers such as scarves, stuffed animals, and rope—won’t be mistaken for actual nests but instead suggest a metaphoric relationship. 

Woomin Kim5
Woomin Kim6
Woomin Kim10

The work’s beguiling interplay between artifice and reality registers a sense of material alienation. Kim’s Depth of Surface series (2016), for instance—in which she lends quotidian readymade objects a matte finish by either sanding them, coating them in translucent paraffin wax, or encasing them in a tight-fitting silk net—transforms overfamiliar objects such as sunglasses and soap dispensers into ghosts of their typical selves.

Woomin Kim8
Woomin Kim7
Woomin Kim9

Kim distinguishes between what she calls “studio choices” and “life choices” in how she handles materials. The former approach, whereby she might heat, flatten, or soak an object to see what happens to it, has an alchemical bent, while the latter—squeezing a soap bottle while doing the dishes, say—is routinized and purposive. Her distinction hinges on intent as much as it does method: routine choices are choices that have become so subconscious as not to seem choices at all. With subtlety and verve, Kim’s art models ways humans can assume more responsibility for their capacity to remake the built world.

Woomin Kim’s work can be seen in the group exhibition Interpreting the Natural: Contemporary Visions of Scholars’ Rocks at the Korean Cultural Center New York in New York City until November 30.

Louis Bury is the author of Exercises in Criticism (Dalkey Archive) and Assistant Professor of English at Hostos Community College, CUNY. He writes regularly about visual art for Hyperallergic, and his creative and critical work has been published in Bookforum, Brooklyn Rail, Los Angeles Review of Books, Boston Review, and The Believer.

Water Portraits: Carolina Caycedo Interviewed by Louis Bury
Costmotarrayas Carolina Caycedo1
Reimagining the Materials of Painting: Eric N. Mack Interviewed by Olivia Gauthier
Eric Mack3

Balance and harmonies through difference.

Jen Bervin and Dianna Frid
Dianna Frid 03 Bomb 137

Through sewing, weaving, and embroidery, two artists probe the boundaries between texts and textiles.

Embodied Practice: Christine Howard Sandoval Interviewed by Louis Bury
Arch Christine Howard Sandoval1 Final

Art that addresses colonial legacies.