Part of the Editor's Choice series.
It’s a tale of the Marcus Family Project, in which “Ben Marcus” is trained by his Silentist mother to lead an emotion-free existence while his father is force-fed language in an underground cell. Like the aggressively mystical Quietists of the 17th-century who sought alternative ways to commune with God, the women of the Silentist movement respond to the disappointments of their world with radical measures, striving to achieve “zero-heart” through the painful abdication of motion and sound. “The whole world is a crime scene,” we are told early on. “The wind is slaughtered when [people] move—should a person cease to move, she would cease to kill the sky and the world might begin to recover.”
Unlike satires that make clear their underlying motive, this book is not telling you what to think—it’s reminding you why to think. What is ultimately exposed are not facets of human experience, but the dependence of those facets (family, love, truth, pain, and pleasure) on the one thing we consistently fail to resist: language. Ben’s mother laments, “I would like … to be new in this awful, old job … to outsmart the role that is destined for me. But I can’t. I have failed to destroy my category.” But failure is not where it ends. We look to the mouth, the “language apparatus,” for possibility. Inevitably, she admits: “It is through Ben’s language apparatus that we are pinning most of our hope, looking for unprecedented utterances. New words, old words said newly, nonwords, sounds. Maybe something else. It’s a big hole there. Anything could come out of it.” In this case, what’s come out of it is a provocative, humorous, haunting work. Marcus finds a way, through writing about the denial of emotion, to write searingly about emotion; by the same token, while his story exploits the follies of language’s categorizing tendencies, as a book it resists categorization. For now, it’s up on my poetry shelf, next to Beckett’s novels.
—Anna Moschovakis
Notable American Women was published by Vintage Books in March 2002.
The novelist on her loss of faith, youth culture, cult leaders, and spending time with syllables.
The imagined city from Gladman’s Ravicka series is as elusive as human self-hood.
“Literature is a way of establishing the humanness of others. It’s interested in the relationships between people, between authenticity and truth. That in itself has to make us better disposed to each other.”
Originally published in
Featuring interviews with Steven Holl, Stephen Mueller, Janet Cardiff, Laurie Sheck, Cornelius Eady, Victor Pelevin, Mohsen Makhmalbaf, Bill Frisell.
Testosterone is the hormone that is the basis of patriarchy. So if you wanna get really deep, it’s like, Do I want to participate in that? I am totally a feminist and, as much as men might not feel empowered, they are in a more powerful position than someone with a vagina, or someone who is feminine or a woman. So what does that mean for me?
Becca Blackwell
